UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Methods for causal inference from gene perturbation experiments and validation
By Nicolai Meinshausen, Alain Hauser, Joris M. Mooij, Jan Peters, Philip Versteeg, Peter Buhlmann. 2016
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Chandler Squires
- Joris M. Mooij
- Sara Magliacane
- Yuhao Wang
- Tom Claassen
- Caroline Uhler
- Karren D. Yang
- Karthikeyan Shanmugam
Citations in the corpus
- Causal Models for Dynamical Systems (2020, methodology): “This finding adds to a recent debate suggesting to add invariance as a fitting criteria to data science methodology [Sch¨olkopf et al., 2012, Yu, 2013, Peters et al., 2016, Bareinboim and Pearl, 2016, Meinshausen et al., 2016, Yu and Kumbier, 2019].”
- Joint Causal Inference from Multiple Contexts (2016, methodology): “ICP has been successfully applied to predict the effects of gene knockouts on gene expression levels (Meinshausen et al., 2016) from large-scale interventional yeast gene expression data (Kemmeren et al.”
- Identifying Best Interventions through Online Importance Sampling (2017, methodology): “, 2013), biological systems (Meinshausen et al., 2016), sociology (Blalock, 1985), agriculture (Splawa-Neyman et al.”
- Permutation-Based Causal Structure Learning with Unknown Intervention Targets (2019, methodology): “A different approach to this problem is given by the invariant causal inference framework (Meinshausen et al., 2016; Rothenhäusler et al., 2015; Ghassami et al., 2017).”
- Permutation-based Causal Inference Algorithms with Interventions (2017, methodology): “Hence GIES is a parametric approach (relying on Gaussianity) and while it has been applied to real data [8, 9, 15], we will demonstrate via an example in Section 3 that it is in general not consistent.”