Finite top quark mass effects in NNLO Higgs boson production at LHC
By Alexey Pak, M. Rogal, Matthias Steinhauser. 2009
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We present next-to-next-to-leading order corrections to the inclusive production of the Higgs bosons at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) including finite top quark mass effects. Expanding our analytic results for the partonic cross section around the soft limit we find agreement with a very recent publication by Harlander and Ozeren [1].
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69808694f2add2bb5430cf604603dda703fc5539
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Gudrun Heinrich
- Cms Collaboration
- F. Tackmann
- Stefan Kallweit
- W. Waalewijn
- Bernhard Mistlberger
- Stefan Dittmaier
- Atlas Collaboration
Citations in the corpus
- Higgs production with a central jet veto at NNLL+NNLO (2010, background): “7) is included, which then turns out to be a very good approximation for the total cross section [14, 18, 19, 97].”
- High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC (2016, methodology): “[22, 23, 48, 49] top-mass corrections at NNLO were computed as an expansion in mH/mt, after factorizing the exact LO cross-section.”
- SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM (2012, unknown): “The total inclusive cross section is known through next-to-nextto-leading order (NNLO) in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [7–18].”
- Factorization at the LHC: From PDFs to Initial State Jets (Ph.D. thesis) (2009, background): “Theoretically, the inclusive Higgs production cross section has been studied extensively in the literature and is known to NNLO [16, 85, 87, 113, 114, 153, 155, 163] (for reviews and additional references see e.”
- Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX (2017, background): “cluster_submit_line[1-99] Lines in cluster submit file to add cluster-specific options.”
- Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD (2012, methodology): “This behaviour is very similar to the one observed for gluoninduced single-Higgs [22–29] and Higgs pair production [16].”
- Automated event generation for loop-induced processes (2015, methodology): “At this level of precision it is important to consider the corrections to the EFT approach, by including effects due to the finite top quark mass [71–73] as well as the interference between top and bottom quark loops [74, 75].”
- Mass effects in the Higgs-gluon coupling: boosted vs. off-shell production (2014, background): “The deviation between the exact calculation and the HEFT approximation in the inclusive gg → H production rate at the LHC is typically within O(10%) [61–67].”
- Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC (2013, unknown): “[37–43].”
- Higgs boson gluon–fusion production at threshold in N3LO QCD (2014, unknown): “On the basis of this belief, further refinements of the cross-section with electroweak corrections and finite quark-mass effects (at a ∼ 5% level of precision) followed [4].”