Testing a Culture-Specific Extension of Objectification Theory Regarding African American Women's Body Image

By Taneisha S. Buchanan, Ann R. Fischer, D. Tokar, J. Yoder. 2008

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Marketing, Pharmacy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/697cba05931d6e6770afa46ac695b3fd2408eff7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Bonnie Moradi
2. Yu-Ping Huang
3. M. Tiggemann
4. Laura Vandenbosch
5. Steven Eggermont
6. Rachel M. Calogero
7. E. Williams
8. Danielle Lindner

In Marketing

1. Yu-Ping Huang
2. Bonnie Moradi
3. Danielle Lindner
4. Stacey Tantleff-Dunn

In Pharmacy

1. Yu-Ping Huang
2. Bonnie Moradi
3. Danielle Lindner
4. Stacey Tantleff-Dunn

Citations in the corpus

• Addressing Gender and Cultural Diversity in Body Image: Objectification Theory as a Framework for Integrating Theories and Grounding Research (2010, background): “Finally, attention to unique manifestations and salience of objectification theory constructs has been fruitful in prior research (e.g., Buchanan et al. 2008; Moradi and Rottenstein 2007; Wiseman and Moradi 2010 )a nd is important for advancing scholarship on gendered body image across diverse gro”
• Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions (2008, background): “Also, Buchanan et al.’s (2008) findings point to the importance of considering the relations of group-specific manifestations of surveillance (e.g., skin tone surveillance) with body shame and dissatisfaction.”