The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors' judgments (retracted)

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Women directors, family ownership and earnings management in Malaysia (2016, background): “Additionally, the evidence supports the contention that women are conservative (Gold et al., 2009; Powell and Ansic, 1997) and their conservatism becomes apparent when they are assigned specific tasks (Peni and Vahamaa, 2010).”
Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data (2012, background): “For example, Gold et al. (2009) find that female auditors are, on average, more influenced by male CFOs and less influenced by female CFOs than male auditors.”
Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions (2016, background): “Second, our results contribute to the limited but growing literature on sex-differentiated audit judgements and decisions (e.g. Chin & Chi, 2008; Gold et al., 2009; Hardies, Breesch, & Branson, 2012).”
The Effect of Audit Experience on Audit Fees and Audit Quality (2015, background): “Gold, Hunton, and Gomaa (2009) find that female auditors are less likely to be swayed by unverified client-provided explanations, but are more (less) likely to be persuaded by male (female) clients when compared with male auditors.”