POLLINATOR SELECTIVITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF DIOECY AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM

By T. Ashman. 2000

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69712b97a2bf8d4d9e586f313fa2ac6f375cc6e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. T. Ashman
2. R. Raguso
3. T. Knight
4. R. Mitchell
5. S. Mazer
6. J. Vamosi
7. Robert R. Junker
8. Ørjan Totland

In Plant Science

1. T. Ashman
2. R. Raguso
3. T. Knight
4. R. Mitchell
5. S. Mazer
6. J. Vamosi
7. W. S. Armbruster

Citations in the corpus

• Start making scents: the challenge of integrating chemistry into pollination ecology (2008, background): “Majetic CJ, Raguso RA, Tonsor SJ & Ashman T-L (2007) Flower color-flower scent associations in polymorphic Hesperis matronalis (Brassicaceae).”
• Pollen Limitation of Plant Reproduction: Pattern and Process (2005, background): “Moreover, female flowers are often avoided by pollinators (e.g., Ashman 2000), indicating that the potential exists for species with unisexual flowers to be more pollen limited than hermaphroditic ones, especially when sexual-dimorphism between the sexes is high and pollinators are scarce (Ashman &…”