Hierarchical Galaxy Formation and Substructure in the Galaxy’s Stellar Halo

By James S. Bullock, Andrey V. Kravtsov, D. Weinberg. 2000

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We develop an explicit model for the formation of the stellar halo from tidally disrupted, accreted dwarf satellites in the cold dark matter (CDM) framework, focusing on predictions testable with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and other wide-field surveys. Subhalo accretion and orbital evolution are calculated using a semianalytic approach based on the extended Press-Schechter formalism. Motivated by our previous work, we assume that low-mass subhalos (vc < 30 km s-1) form significant populations of stars only if they accreted a substantial fraction of their mass before the epoch of reionization. With this assumption, the model reproduces the observed velocity function of galactic satellites in the Local Group, solving the "dwarf satellite problem" without modifying the basic tenets of the popular Λ + CDM cosmological scenario. The tidally disrupted satellites in this model yield a stellar distribution whose total mass and radial density profile are consistent with those observed for the Milky Way stellar halo. Most significantly, the model predicts the presence of many large-scale, coherent substructures in the outer halo. These substructures are remnants of individual tidally disrupted dwarf satellite galaxies. Substructure is more pronounced at large galactocentric radii because of the smaller number density of tidal streams and the longer orbital times. This model provides a natural explanation for the coherent structures in the outer stellar halo found in the SDSS commissioning data, and it predicts that many more such structures should be found as the survey covers more of the sky. The detection (or nondetection) and characterization of such structures could eventually test variants of the CDM scenario, especially those that aim to solve the dwarf satellite problem by enhancing satellite disruption.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/696104e5200183834c7329a02aae08ea1f2978c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. R. Dav'e

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. R. Somerville

Citations in the corpus