Unraveling the enigma of human intelligence: Evolutionary psychology and the multimodular mind.
By L. Cosmides, J. Tooby. 2002
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/695c7aade6fd491e1edda9582fe15b3c4e0702ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- C. David Navarrete
- Daniel M.T. Fessler
- L. Penke
- Satoshi Kanazawa
- Lee A. Kirkpatrick
- Jaap J. A. Denissen
- Robert Kurzban
- Mark Schaller
Citations in the corpus
- The evolutionary genetics of personality (2007, background): “21: 549–587 (2007) DOI: 10.1002/per discuss these heritable, variable traits as if they were invariant adaptations (Cosmides & Tooby, 2002; Kanazawa, 2004).”
- Herbert Simon's Decision-Making Approach: Investigation of Cognitive Processes in Experts (2010, background): “On the other hand, evolutionary psychologists propose that the cognitive system contains multiple domain-specific modules (Cosmides & Tooby, 2002; Raab & Gigerenzer, 2005).”
- Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent (2010, result): “In contrast to views expressed by Miller (2000), Cosmides and Tooby (2002), and Chiappe and MacDonald (2005), Kanazawa (2004b) proposes that what is now known as general intelligence may have originally evolved as a domain-specific adaptation to deal with evolutionarily novel, nonrecurrent problems.”
- Anxiety and Intergroup Bias: Terror Management or Coalitional Psychology? (2004, background): “…indicates that affective systems are well designed to prompt appropriate behavior in the face of adaptive challenges likely to have confronted ancestral humans (Cosmides & Tooby, 2002; Curtis & Biran, 2001; Damasio, 1994; Fiske, 2002; Frank, 2001; Kirkpatrick, Waugh, Valencia, & Webster, 2002).”
- Normative Bias and Adaptive Challenges: A Relational Approach to Coalitional Psychology and a Critique of Terror Management Theory (2005, background): “…social science is that highly general motivational systems are unlikely to evolve, as natural selection can only build mechanisms designed to solve particular adaptive problems (Barrett, 2005; Boyer, 2000; Buss, 2001; Cosmides and Tooby, 1994, 2002; Pinker, 1997; Rozin, 1976; Symons, 1992).”