Industrial Dynamics and the Problem of Nature

By W. Boyd, W. Scott Prudham, Rachel A. Schurman. 2001

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rules of Privatization: Contradictions in Neoliberal Regulation of North Pacific Fisheries (2004, background): “Recently this view of barriers and obstacles has been turned around to see such constraints, instead, as opportunities, as biophysical properties of resources and agricultural processes create new possibilities for economic innovation and investment ( Henderson 1998 , 1999 ; W.”
Making a Global Gas Market: Territoriality and Production Networks in Liquefied Natural Gas (2017, background): “Building on calls to better understand the “influence materiality exerts on industrial organization” (Bridge 2008, 415; see also Boyd, Prudham, and Schurman 2001; Prudham 2005; Hudson 2008), this work explores the significance of materials, and biological, chemical, and mechanical processes, within…”
Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy” (2010, methodology): “The real subsumption of nature can intensify the productivity of those natural resources [6].”
Theorizing the Bioeconomy (2013, background): “In their analysis, Boyd, Prudham, and Schurman (2001) specifically reference biotechnology and the possibilities it offers for the real subsumption of nature, implying that we could theorize some form of biological, rather than labor, productivity.”