Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY).
By Randy Borum, H. Lodewijks, Patrick A. Bartel, Adelle E. Forth. 2006
266 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- Tong Wang
- Carlos Castillo
- Marius Miron
- Emilia G'omez
- Songül Tolan
Citations in the corpus
- Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, background): “rnton, 2003; Langton et al., 2007), and general violence (see e.g., Historical Clinical and Risk Management tool of Webster et al. 1997, or the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth tool of Borum 2006). The scoring systems that we present in this paper are designed to mimic the form of ris”
- Risk-Needs Assessment in Juvenile Justice (2011, methodology): “The SAVRY (Borum et al., 2006) was designed to assess violence risk in adolescents, ages 12 to 18 years, who have been detained or referred for an assessment of violence risk.”
- Why Machine Learning May Lead to Unfairness: Evidence from Risk Assessment for Juvenile Justice in Catalonia (2019, methodology): “"[8].”