Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks

By Matthew L. Dixon, Alejandro de la Vega, Caitlin Mills, Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna, R. Nathan Spreng, Michael W. Cole, Kalina Christoff. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017

535 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Capturing the spatiotemporal dynamics of self-generated, task-initiated thoughts with EEG and fMRI (2019, unknown): “Furthermore, the observation of increase of microstate D and decrease of microstate C fits very well to the observation that the FPCN and the DMN are inversely activated when participants are engaged in external-directed and self-directed cognition (Dixon et al., 2018).”
Towards a Universal Taxonomy of Macro-scale Functional Human Brain Networks (2019, unknown): “In resting state fMRI work, the D-FPN is commonly referred to as the “dorsal attention system” (Fox et al. 2006) or “dorsal attention network” (Yeo et al. 2011).”
Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control (2021, background): “Frontoparietal intercommunication has previously been associated with attentional processes (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Ptak, 2012; Marshall et al., 2015; Dixon et al., 2018).”