Mixtures of plant disease suppressive bacteria enhance biological control of multiple tomato pathogens

By I. Siddiqui, S. Shaukat. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2002

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Constraints in Bioformulation, Commercialization, and Future Strategies (2010, background): “The combination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pochonia chlamydospora caused greater suppression of fungal phytopathogens and promoted plant growth compared with their individual application ( Siddiqui and Shaukat 2002 ).”
Role of cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 in the suppression of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica in tomato (2006, methodology): “Further studies of the mode-of-action indicated CHA0-mediated induction of systemic resistance as a control mechanism (Siddiqui & Shaukat 2002c).”
Effect of Different Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Maize Seed Germination and Seedling Development (2013, result): “In different studies where pants were inoculated with Pseudomonas, Azospirillum and Azotobacter species the results were similar to those obtained in our study [36,20,37].”
Microbial control of plant-parasitic nematodes: a five-party interaction (2006, background): “The control mechanisms include suppression of juvenile survival (Siddiqui and Shaukat 2002).”