Occurrence rate of earthward‐propagating dipolarization fronts

By H. Fu, Y. Khotyaintsev, Andris Vaivads, M. André, S. Huang. 2012

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6917d40fb462bf53b2c3fbaccb3a8358cd717010

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. A. Runov
2. V. Sergeev
3. R. Nakamura
4. R. McPherron
5. Y. Khotyaintsev
6. Wolfgang Baumjohann
7. Tuija I. Pulkkinen
8. Juhani Birn

In Molecular Biology

1. A. Runov
2. V. Sergeev
3. Y. Khotyaintsev
4. Tuija I. Pulkkinen
5. Juhani Birn
6. R. Nakamura
7. R. McPherron
8. M. Sitnov

Citations in the corpus

• Substorm Current Wedge Revisited (2015, result): “The comprehensive statistical view of the geometrical properties and the plasma and field variations around the dipolarization fronts obtained in recent studies (Liu et al. 2013; Fu et al. 2012) is remarkably consistent with the simulation results described in Sect.”
• Dipolarization fronts as a consequence of transient reconnection: In situ evidence (2013, methodology): “We identify these two jumps as DFs as they satisfy the following criteria [see Runov et al., 2009; Schmid et al., 2011; Fu et al., 2012b]: (1) BzGSM was the dominant component of magnetic field; (2) BzGSM increased/decreased more than 4 nT during several seconds, and simultaneously, the inclination…”