Consistent mesh parameterizations

By Emil Praun, Wim Sweldens, Peter Schröder. International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 2001

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/690a32ba5fcb6031e90ba0cac38b19ac9c29fc94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

In Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Citations in the corpus

Surface Parameterization: a Tutorial and Survey (2005, unknown): “The challenge of this approach is to obtain mappings that are smooth across the patch boundaries and the first methods [12, 42, 59, 30, 21] suffered indeed from this problem.”
Recent Advances in Remeshing of Surfaces (2008, methodology): “A more general approach is to parameterize the models over a common base mesh [46, 48, 55, 65].”
Cross-parameterization and compatible remeshing of 3D models (2004, methodology): “) [Praun et al. 2001], fitting template meshes to multiple data sets [Marshner et al.”
Recent Advances in Mesh Morphing (2002, methodology): “Praun et al. have termed the synthesis-analysis part digital geometry processing(DGP) 55 .”
ABF++: fast and robust angle based flattening (2005, background): “Applications that beneﬁt from parameterized representation include multiresolution editing [Lee et al. 1998], surface ﬁtting [Hormann and Greiner 2000], mesh morphing [Praun et al. 2001], remeshing [Alliez et al. 2003], and extrapolation [Levy 2003], to name just a few.”
Mesh parameterization: theory and practice (2007, methodology): “[Praun et al., 2001]), or the interpolation between the shape and appearance of several objects [Alexa, 2000; Kraevoy and Sheffer, 2004; Schreiner et al.”
GWCNN: A Metric Alignment Layer for Deep Shape Analysis (2017, unknown): “Mapping a shape to another domain is a common task in shape analysis with applications to texture mapping [LPRM02], modeling [PSS01], correspondence [AL16], and retrieval [SK16].”
Inter-surface mapping (2004, methodology): “The surface is partitioned into triangular regions that are mapped respectively to faces of D [e.g. Eck et al 1995; Lee et al 1998; Guskov et al 2000; Praun et al 2001].”
The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans (2003, methodology): “As in Praun et al. [2001], once we have a consistent parameterization, we can transfer texture maps between any pair of meshes.”
Blended intrinsic maps (2011, methodology): “For example, [Praun et al. 2001] used a base coarse mesh (provided by a user) as such a domain.”
Mesh segmentation using feature point and core extraction (2005, background): “Feature points are useful in many applications, including metamorphosis [1], deformation transfer [32], mesh retrieval [37], cross-parameterization [16, 25, 27], texture mapping [17, 33], and segmentation [33, 35].”
Robust 3D Shape Correspondence in the Spectral Domain (2006, methodology): “Most methods [27, 20, 21, 29] rely on the user to specify the initial feature correspondence manually.”