Marginal pricing of transmission services: a comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods
By F. J. Rubio-Oderiz, Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga. 2000
177 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68fa722b44b10a1761bbcd8a0b15c009c6f9cea0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Toward a combined merchant-regulatory mechanism for electricity transmission expansion (2010, unknown): “Therefore, Rubio-Odériz and Pérez-Arriaga (2000) propose that revenues from FTRs be complemented with a charge (complementary charge) to recuperate the remaining 75% (fixed) costs.”
- An Aumann-Shapley Approach to Allocate Transmission Service Cost Among Network Users in Electricity Markets (2007, background): “Several complementary charges have been formulated and applied in the literature [4], [16], [22].”
- Optimization approach to real power tracing: an application to transmission fixed cost allocation (2006, background): “To recover the embedded costs of the network, topping up of marginal prices with a complementary charge has been proposed in [8] and [9].”