On the Validity of Environmental Performance Metrics

By N. Semenova, L. Hassel. 2015

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility – An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches (2015, background): “We expand upon important previous evidence of Semenova and Hassel (2014) and Chatterji et al (2015), focusing on an in-depth analysis of both the rating methodology and their descriptive statistics, distribution and ESG level.”
Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Environmental Performance on Corporate Financial Performance in Developed and Developing Countries (2017, background): “The ASSET4 database enjoys recognition for its complete ratings of social responsibility, including environmental, corporate governance, economic and social dimensions, providing objective, comparable and systematic extra-financial information that is assessed by independent external social audits [”
Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings (2020, background): “Our paper extends a stream of research that has documented the divergence of ESG ratings (Chatterji et al., 2016, 2009; Semenova and Hassel, 2015; Dorfleitner et al., 2015; Delmas and Blass, 2010).”