The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems
By J. Dow, R. Neilan, Chris Rizos. 2009
1,457 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68c9233b023a3f0952dcd6da41dcbbe14cc49049
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Peter Steigenberger
- Urs Hugentobler
- Xavier Collilieux
- Oliver Montenbruck
- G. Wöppelmann
- Yidong Lou
- Qiuying Guo
- Carlos Rodríguez-Solano
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Peter Steigenberger
- Urs Hugentobler
- Oliver Montenbruck
- Qiuying Guo
- Carlos Rodríguez-Solano
- Rolf Dach
- M. Fritsche
- Heike Bock
In Oceanography
- Urs Hugentobler
- Peter Steigenberger
- Xavier Collilieux
- Oliver Montenbruck
- G. Wöppelmann
- Rolf Dach
- Qiuying Guo
- Carlos Rodríguez-Solano
Citations in the corpus
- Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data (2010, background): “Table 6 summarizes the scatter about the IGS defined coordinates for the 106 stations that define the IGS05 frame.”
- Improving BeiDou real-time precise point positioning with numerical weather models (2017, methodology): “Thanks to the recent development of the International GNSS Service (IGS, Dow et al. 2009) real-time pilot project, the real-time precise satellite orbit and clock corrections are officially distributed online, to support the RT-PPP service with global coverage (Caissy et al. 2012).”
- Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison (2010, neutral): “One year of daily GPS data at about 350 globally distributed reference stations from the International GNSS Service (IGS) permanent network in 2008 were used (Dow et al. 2009).”
- Statistics of total electron content depletions observed over the South American continent for the year 2008 (2011, methodology): “They were deployed by LISN, Ohio State University ‐ Central and Southern Andes GPS Project (OSU‐CAP), Geocentric Reference System for the Americas (SIRGAS) [Brunini et al., 2011] and International GNSS service (IGS) [Dow et al., 2009] networks.”
- Modeling tropospheric wet delays with national GNSS reference network in China for BeiDou precise point positioning (2018, methodology): “Attributed to the Real-Time Pilot Project (RTPP) and motivated by the International GNSS Service (IGS, Dow et al. 2009), IGS real-time service (RTS) was officially launched on 1 April 2013 and provides real-time official products for GPS and unofficial products for GLONASS (Caissy et al. 2012;…”
- A comparison of three PPP integer ambiguity resolution methods (2014, methodology): “from the International GNSS Service (IGS) by means of the precise clock products (Kouba 2009; Kouba and Héroux 2001; Dow et al. 2009), and the receiver code clock cdt PIF is to be estimated.”
- The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 (2016, methodology): “Following thefirst successful reprocessing campaign (repro1; Steigenberger et al. 2006, 2009; Collilieux et al. 2011) performed by the International GNSS Service (IGS; Dow et al. 2009) in 2008, a second IGS reprocessing campaign (repro2) was recently undertaken.”
- Precision Orbit Determination Standards for the Jason Series of Altimeter Missions (2010, background): “The former is the current International GNSS Service (IGS; Dow et al. 2009) standard and provides the basis for computing the empirical APV map for Jason-2 (Bertiger et al. this issue).”
- Estimation of velocity uncertainties from GPS time series: Examples from the analysis of the South African TrigNet network (2011, methodology): “For consistency, orbit products from the CODE (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) Analysis Center of the International GNSS Service (IGS) were used [Dow et al., 2009].”
- Single-frequency precise point positioning: an analytical approach (2015, methodology): “Our case study is based on the GPS data from 19 permanent stations, where 14 of them are part of the IGS tracking network (Dow et al. 2009) and 5 of them are part of the EPN tracking network (Bruyninx et al. 2011).”
- A compilation of UAV applications for precision agriculture (2020, neutral): “…such as imaging sensors, Inertial Measurements Unit (IMU) [59] , synthetic aperture radar [60] and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) [61] resulted in the development of civilian UAVs capable of assisting the evolution of multiple fields, such as PA, geomatics, logistics and…”
- Reducing the draconitic errors in GNSS geodetic products (2014, methodology): “Hugentobler et al. (2006) and Meindl et al. (2013) relate the geocenter motion with the orbit modeling parameters, in particular radiation pressure parameters, due to correlations between them. The first paper states that the patterns found in the geocenter Z -component with distinct periods of one ”
- Precision comparison and analysis of four online free PPP services in static positioning and tropospheric delay estimation (2015, methodology): “The PPP processing is based on the International GNSS Service (IGS) precise orbit and clocks products, satellite antenna phase center offsets, and tropospheric delay model (including dry and wet component and mapping functions) (Dow et al. 2009).”
- Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results (2016, methodology): “The first reference describes spurious spectral lines in the IGS station coordinates as early as 2008, based on GNSS results at a time when GLONASS did not yet play a significant role in the IGS network.”