Negated and Misprimed Probes for Pretrained Language Models: Birds Can Talk, But Cannot Fly

By Nora Kassner, Hinrich Schütze. 2019

382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Building on Petroni et al. 2019, we propose two new probing tasks analyzing factual knowledge stored in Pretrained Language Models (PLMs). (1) Negation. We find that PLMs do not distinguish between negated (‘‘Birds cannot [MASK]”) and non-negated (‘‘Birds can [MASK]”) cloze questions. (2) Mispriming. Inspired by priming methods in human psychology, we add “misprimes” to cloze questions (‘‘Talk? Birds can [MASK]”). We find that PLMs are easily distracted by misprimes. These results suggest that PLMs still have a long way to go to adequately learn human-like factual knowledge.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Percy Liang
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Hinrich Schütze

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Yejin Choi
  3. Luc Van Gool
  4. Jianfeng Gao
  5. Dacheng Tao
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Percy Liang
  8. Xiaogang Wang

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Percy Liang
  6. Hinrich Schütze
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Jonathan Berant

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Jonathan Berant
  3. Kyle Richardson
  4. Hinrich Schütze
  5. Ronan Le Bras
  6. Timo Schick
  7. Matt Gardner
  8. Mohit Bansal

Citations in the corpus