Does Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation Enhance Auditor Independence? Evidence from Spain
By Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo, Nieves Go´mez‐Aguilar, Nieves Carrera. 2009
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/68b59429f9fc4ca2b0bcc5d0db894d428dc351a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Michael Firth
- Oliver M. Rui
- Tianyu Zhang
- Xi Wu
- M. Trombetta
- Annalisa Prencipe
- Clive Lennox
- Nopmanee Tepalagul
Citations in the corpus
- Auditor Independence and Audit Quality (2015, background): “However, archival evidence in Spain does not lend any support to mandatory firm rotation (Ruiz-Barbadillo et al., 2009).”
- How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China (2012, background): “For example, Kim and Yi (2009) document a positive effect of mandatory firm rotation on FRQ/AQ in Korea, whereas Ruiz-Barbadillo et al. (2009) find no such effect in their study of Spanish firms.”
- Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality (2016, background): “Ruiz-Barbadillo et al. (2009) analyse the Spanish setting, comparing an MAR period (1991–1994) to a voluntary rotation period (1995–2000), and find no evidence of any significant change in audit quality between the two periods.”
- Does Mandatory Rotation of Audit Partners Improve Audit Quality (2014, background): “Ruiz-Barbadillo, Gomez-Aguilar, and Carrera (2009) examine Spain, where audit firm rotation was mandatory from 1988 to 1995.”