Dispersal ability rather than ecological tolerance drives differences in range size between lentic and lotic water beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae)
By P. Arribas, J. Velasco, P. Abellán, D. Sánchez‐Fernández, C. Andújar, P. Calosi, A. Millán, I. Ribera, D. Bilton. 2012
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/689755268c24e72f01fa4e222f25a3955bb9bff6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- A. Millán
- Megan J. Hirst
- Jason P. Sexton
- S. J. Ormerod
- R. Slatyer
- Jorge M. Lobo
- A. Jiménez‐Valverde
- Wilfried Thuiller
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- The CIPRES science gateway: enabling high-impact science for phylogenetics researchers with limited resources (2012, background): “• Water beetle species that inhabit standing waters have much broader ranges than their running water counterparts because of an enhanced ability to disperse themselves, rather than a greater tolerance for new environments [22].”
- Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. (2013, background): “…hypothesis has been discussed, debated and tested in numerous studies and books (e.g. Brown 1984; Gaston et al. 1997, 2000; Gaston & Blackburn 2000; Arribas et al. 2012; Boulangeat et al. 2012), yet a general consensus on the presence or magnitude of such a relationship has been slow to emerge.”
- Contrasting effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors on beta diversity in river organisms (2013, background): “Similarly, differences in the recolonization capacities of organisms following recent glaciations have led to different regional species pools and beta-diversity patterns in Europe (Svenning & Skov, 2007; Arribas et al., 2012; Baselga et al., 2012).”