Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “Insect pollination also has high economic value to 123 humans (Allsopp et al., 2008, Hein, 2009; Palomo et al., 2015; Winfree et al., 2011b), 124 significantly increasing the yield and health of cultivated crops (see Table 1), placing the 125 value of insect pollination for world agriculture >…”
Opportunities for knowledge co-production across the energy-food-water nexus: Making interdisciplinary approaches work for better climate decision making (2017, background): “…co-production frameworks have been applied to societal issues such as climate change (Howarth et al., 2017), urban development (Omondi et al., 2014), multi-level governance and planning (Watson, 2013), policy evaluation (Fagan-Watson et al., 2017) and ecosystem services (Palomo et al., 2016).”
When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models (2017, background): “Recently, for irrigation) or management institutions (e.g., collective use rights around irrigation water) that can be critical to the delivery or accessibility of ES and their benefits (Reyers et al. 2013, Palomo et al. 2016).”