Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

By Eric Cavalcanti, S. J. Jones, Howard M. Wiseman, M. Reid. 2009

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We formally link the concept of steering (a concept created by Schrodinger but only recently formalized by Wiseman, Jones and Doherty Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 140402 (2007)]) and the criteria for demonstrations of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox introduced by Reid Phys. Rev. A 40 913 (1989)]. We develop a general theory of experimental EPR-steering criteria, derive a number of criteria applicable to discrete as well as continuous-variable observables, and study their efficacy in detecting that form of nonlocality in some classes of quantum states. We show that previous versions of EPR-type criteria can be rederived within this formalism, thus unifying these efforts from a modern quantum-information perspective and clarifying their conceptual and formal origin. The theory follows in close analogy with criteria for other forms of quantum nonlocality (Bell nonlocality and entanglement), and because it is a hybrid of those two, it may lead to insights into the relationship between the different forms of nonlocality and the criteria that are able to detect them.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/688770a2a4d78c936508c10ca99b7d07542afbd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Otfried Gühne
  2. Roman Schnabel
  3. H. C. Nguyen
  4. Roope Uola
  5. Ana C. S. Costa
  6. Daniel Cavalcanti
  7. Nicolas Brunner
  8. G. Pryde

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Otfried Gühne
  2. Roman Schnabel
  3. H. C. Nguyen
  4. Roope Uola
  5. Ana C. S. Costa
  6. Daniel Cavalcanti
  7. Nicolas Brunner
  8. Eric Cavalcanti

In Physiology

  1. Roman Schnabel

Citations in the corpus