Modeling the Cost of Climate Policy: Distinguishing Between Alternative Cost Definitions and Long-Run Cost Dynamics

By Mark Jaccard, J. Nyboer, Chris Bataille, Bryn Sadownik. 2003

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A structural VAR analysis of renewable energy consumption, real GDP and CO2 emissions: Evidence from India (2011, background): “In addition, a sharp increase of CO2 concentration is mostly due to the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) (Halicioglu, 2009 and Soytas and Sari, 2009) arising from the energy sector (Jaccard et al., 2003 and Köhler et al., 2006).”
Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage (2009, background): “In this sense, DEMETER is fundamentally hybrid and, because of its endogenous cost definition, fit for analysing long-term energy technology cost dynamics and deriving practical insight for climate policy making (Jaccard et al. 2003).”
Options and Instruments for a Deep Cut in CO2 Emissions: Carbon Dioxide Capture or Renewables, Taxes or Subsidies? (2006, methodology): “In this sense, our model is hybrid and especially useful for deriving insight for policy making (Jaccard et al., 2003).”
The Impact of Renewable Energy Sources on Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions - a SVAR approach (2012, background): “Indeed, a sharp increase of CO2 concentration cannot be ignored, mostly due to the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) [(Halicioglu, 2009), (Soytas and Sari, 2009)] arising from the energy sector [(Jaccard et al., 2003), (Köhler et al.”