DIETS OF THREE SPECIES OF ANDEAN CARNIVORES IN HIGH-ALTITUDE DESERTS OF ARGENTINA

By R. S. Walker, A. Novaro, P. Perovic, Rocío Palacios, E. Donadio, M. Lucherini, Mónica V. Pía, M. López. 2007

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/687ac1bff51876bd8b10ed60a3b550ba7bf35fcb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. B. Harmsen
2. R. Foster
3. C. Patrick Doncaster
4. M. Lucherini
5. M. Merino
6. B. Valdés
7. C. Pomilla
8. Mathias Tobler

In Genetics

1. M. Lucherini
2. R. Foster
3. B. Harmsen

In Social Psychology

1. C. Patrick Doncaster
2. R. Foster
3. B. Harmsen

Citations in the corpus

• Food habits of sympatric jaguars and pumas across a gradient of human disturbance (2010, methodology): “…strategies and using different habitats (e.g. Seidensticker, 1976; Fedriana et al., 1999), but perhaps most commonly by using prey of different size-class or taxa (e.g. Bertram, 1982; Bothma, Nel & Macdonald, 1984; Sunquist, Sunquist & Daneke, 1989; Karanth & Sunquist, 2000; Walker et al., 2007).”
• Perceptions of Human–Carnivore Conflicts in the High Andes of Argentina (2008, background): “…status, has recently been the focus of research (García Perea 2002; Lucherini and Luengos Vidal 2003; Perovic et al 2003), the other members of the carnivore guild have so far received little attention (but see Walker et al 2007) and no estimates of populations and trends are available.”