Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete.

761 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives. (2014, background): “136 Marinkovic et al. (2010) A Concrete Serbia h – j j”
The effect of fly ash content and types of aggregates on the properties of pre-fabricated concrete interlocking blocks (PCIBs) (2012, background): “This attached mortar is the main reason for lower quality of recycled concrete aggregates compared to natural aggregate [6].”
Green concrete containing diatomaceous earth and limestone: Workability, mechanical properties, and life-cycle assessment (2019, background): “It is shown that the production of recycled aggregate concrete generates higher GWP and demands higher energy use than that of natural river aggregate concrete mainly due to energy demand in crushing (Marinkovic et al., 2010).”
Computational design optimization of concrete mixtures: A review (2018, background): “materials (SCMs) [28,29], and mixtures with recycled aggregates [30].”