Ellipsoidal Trust Region Methods and the Marginal Value of Hessian Information for Neural Network Training
By Leonard Adolphs, Jonas Köhler, Aurélien Lucchi. 2019
12 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We investigate the use of ellipsoidal trust region constraints for second-order optimization of neural networks. This approach can be seen as a higher-order counterpart of adaptive gradient methods, which we here show to be interpretable as first-order trust region methods with ellipsoidal constraints. In particular, we show that the preconditioning matrix used in RMSProp and Adam satisfies the necessary conditions for convergence of (first- and) second-order trust region methods and report that this ellipsoidal constraint constantly outperforms its spherical counterpart in practice. We furthermore set out to clarify the long-standing question of the potential superiority of Newton methods in deep learning. In this regard, we run extensive benchmarks across different datasets and architectures to find that comparable performance to gradient descent algorithms can be achieved but using Hessian information does not give rise to better limit points and comes at the cost of increased hyperparameter tuning.
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Christopher J. Shallue
- Chris J. Maddison
- Dami Choi
- George E. Dahl
- Jaehoon Lee
- Zachary Nado
- Yann LeCun
- Samuel L. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- On Empirical Comparisons of Optimizers for Deep Learning (2019, background): “We can also view (cid:15) as setting a trust region radius (Martens and Grosse, 2015; Adolphs et al., 2019) and controlling an interpolation between momentum and diagonal natural gradient descent, by either diminishing or increasing the effect of v t on the update direction.”