Importance of early successional habitat to ruffed grouse and American woodcock

By D. R. Dessecker, D. McAuley. 2001

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/685f5e1d808dc001c4ceaaeb885246c5b40889ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Rodewald
2. A. Vitz
3. R. Dettmers
4. R. Askins
5. David I. King
6. S. Schlossberg

Citations in the corpus

• EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS (2005, background): “As shrubland habitats have become increasingly uncommon in many eastern landscapes, populations of several shrubland specialists have declined at alarming rates (Askins 1993, Litvaitis 1993, Dessecker and McAuley 2001, Hunter et al. 2001).”
• Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats (2001, background): “For example, ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) do best in young, even-age deciduous forests, particularly aspen forests (Dessecker and McAuley 2001).”
• Status and conservation of shrubland birds in the northeastern US (2003, methodology): “Other information, such as data from the North American Singing-ground Survey, shows that the population change for this species was a significant decline during this period ( Dessecker and McAuley, 2001; Kelly, 2002).”