Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession
By S. Bartha, S. J. Meiners, Steward T. A. Pickett, Mary L. Cadenasso. 2003
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6840877cc548a81f31dbe650adf7f436b929d48b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Regeneration of sandy old-fields in the forest steppe region of Hungary (2011, background): “…type, biotic and abiotic conditions of the site, surrounding landscape, duration and intensity of previous land use have all been shown to affect recovery (Prach et al. 1993; Martı́nez-Ruiz et al. 2001; Bartha et al. 2003; Prach & Rehounková 2006; Cousins & Aggemyr 2008; Szabó & Prach 2009).”
- The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms (2005, background): “Interannual variations in establishment success (Bartha et al. 2003), also known as year effects , have been a persistent problem for ecological restoration practitioners, who often have only a single planting year to achieve their project goals.”
- Impact of mid‐successional dominant species on the diversity and progress of succession in regenerating temperate grasslands (2014, background): “%) colonize as early as the first 5 yr of regeneration dynamics (Bartha et al. 2003).”
- Seminatural grassland management by mowing of Calamagrostis epigejos in Hungary (2011, background): “Mowing decreased the cover of C. epigejos and also the amount of the C. epigejos litter, i.e. mowing probably ‘‘switched off’’ the establishment limitation and it opened a ‘‘successional window’’ (Johnstone 1986; Bartha et al. 2003) for colonizing species.”