Direct payments for biodiversity conservation in developing countries: practical insights for design and implementation
By S. Milne, E. Niesten. Oryx, 2009
117 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/682cd76ac4e2833d158b41039c7cc5d4ee9b1c22
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Redefining payments for environmental services (2012, methodology): “10 Milne and Niesten (2009) note that monitoring and enforcement activities can”
- Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “In a large number of cases, PES have contributed to reinforcing collective and individual conservation behavior as schemes have been characterized by low levels of environmental additionality and financial compensation [36,37,58 ].”
- Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services (2014, background): “In particular, in the event of failure to meet the terms of an agreement, the program would take away a form of payment that is easy to withdraw, whereas others such as a schoolteacher’s salary would not be removed unless the program failed completely (Milne and Niesten 2009).”
- Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions:Comparison of three programs from Cambodia? (2010, unknown): “, 2008), and contracts brokered between organisations and private landowners, communities or governments (Milne and Niesten, 2009).”