An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models

By Wenceslao González-Manteiga, Rosa M. Crujeiras. Test (Madrid), 2013

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/681ab9d5121a556ca13200123602c1b7ab7da8b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna
2. Brantly Callaway

In Statistics and Probability

1. Brantly Callaway
2. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna
3. X. d'Haultfoeuille
4. C. Chaisemartin
5. Jonathan Roth
6. Andrew Goodman-Bacon
7. Ro’ee Levy
8. Martin Mattsson

Citations in the corpus

• Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods (2018, result): “These results build on many papers in the goodness-of-fit literature – see e.g. Bierens (1982), Bierens and Ploberger (1997), Stute (1997), and Escanciano (2006b, 2008); for a recent overview, see González-Manteiga and Crujeiras (2013).”