On the Morita Equivalence of Tensor Algebras

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hardy algebras, W*-correspondences and interpolation theory (2003, background): “Briefly, the setting of [25] and its sequels [26, 27, 28] is this.”
Semicrossed Products of Operator Algebras by Semigroups (2014, methodology): “However, there are interesting degenerate C*-correspondences, such as C*correspondences arising from non-surjective C*-dynamical systems.”
Schur class operator functions and automorphisms of Hardy algebras (2006, background): “tions σof C on Hilbert spaces H, that is, through evaluating functions in H∞(B(X)n 1) at points the unit ball of B(H)n for all possible H’s. The space B(K)n is Morita equivalent to Cn in the sense of [21], at least when dim(K) <∞, and, in that case the tensor algebras T+(B(K)n) and T+(Cn) are Mor”
Topological Quivers (2003, background): “) Our objective in this paper is to pick up where [40] left off by establishing basic facts about topological quiver algebras, analyzing parallels with the theory of ordinary graph C∗-algebras, and highlighting novelties of the theory that result from the imposition of topological constraints.”