Is it still possible to extend TCP?
By Michio Honda, Yoshifumi Nishida, Costin Raiciu, Adam Greenhalgh, Mark James Handley, H. Tokuda. ACM/SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, 2011
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/680c4a69a063c2b7c26df3a0ff717d7a61ad9e08
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Quentin De Coninck
- Christoph Paasch
- Olivier Bonaventure
- Costin Raiciu
- Mark James Handley
- Michio Honda
- Sylvia Ratnasamy
- Sébastien Barré
Citations in the corpus
- The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment (2017, background): “As a result, even modifying TCP remains challenging due to its ossification by middleboxes [29, 49, 54].”
- Design and Implementation of a Consolidated Middlebox Architecture (2012, background): “Middlebox measurements: Studies have measured the end-to-end impact of middleboxes [10] and interactions with transport protocols [24].”
- How Hard Can It Be? Designing and Implementing a Deployable Multipath TCP (2012, methodology): “Does such a handshake still work? We performed a large study to test this - complete results are available in [9].”
- Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation (2017, methodology): “Despite the proliferation of middleboxes [22], TCP continues to be incrementally improved [14] with recent extensions including Multipath TCP [17] or TCPCrypt [3].”