Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

By N. Bellenger, M. Burgess, S. Ray, A. Lahiri, A. Coats, J. Cleland, D. Pennell. European Heart Journal, 2000

1,042 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/680bf90b27cc6056769dedd08b461df3a9ef494b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

T. Marwick

Citations in the corpus

Dilated Cardiomyopathy (2007, neutral): “SSFP cine imaging is currently regarded as the gold standard imaging technique for the evaluation of LV volume and systolic function [1, 2], as it is not affected by the geometric assumptions used in 2D echocardiography for the LV (such as the area-length method) [3] (Fig.”
2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (2016, methodology): “As echocardiography and multigated radionuclide angiography have different reference values, the same technique should be performed for baseline and follow-up studies.(105,106) Cardiac magnetic resonance.”
Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. (2014, result): “MUGA compared with other modalities As a 3D imaging technique, MUGA has consistently outperformed standard 2DE with respect to accuracy and reproducibility of LVEF measurements.(206,207) In several studies, the values obtained by MUGA showed much higher correlations with those obtained with other 3D”
2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). (2016, methodology): “As echocardiography and multigated radionuclide angiography have different reference values, the same technique should be performed for baseline and follow-up studies.(105,106) Cardiac magnetic resonance.”
Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. (2014, result): “In several studies, the values obtained by MUGA showed much higher correlations with those obtained with other 3D imaging tools, such as CMR and novel 3D echocardiographic techniques, but individual LV volumes and LVEF values still differed significantly across the techniques.(206,208) Together, the”