Consistent modelling of the meta-galactic UV background and the thermal/ionization history of the intergalactic medium

By E. Puchwein, F. Haardt, M. Haehnelt, P. Madau. Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2018

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent observations suggest that hydrogen reionization ends late (⁠|$z$| ≃ 6) and proceeds quickly. We present here a new model of the meta-galactic ultraviolet/X-ray background (UVB) that is consistent with this. It adopts the most recent determinations of the ionizing emissivity due to stars and active galactic nuclei (AGN), as well as of the H i absorber column density distribution. Another major improvement is a new treatment of the intergalactic medium (IGM) opacity for ionizing photons that is able to consistently capture the transition from a neutral to an ionized IGM. Previous synthesis models of the UVB, when used in simulations, yield reionization and thermal histories that are inconsistent with the assumed ionizing emissivities. With our new treatment, this discrepancy is fully resolved. In our fiducial model, galaxies leaking |${\lesssim}18{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$| of their Lyman continuum emission drive H i reionization, while AGN drive He ii reionization (completing at |$z$| ≃ 6.2 and 2.8, respectively). Due to the limited time available for cooling between H i and He ii reionization, higher IGM temperatures are predicted for late reionization scenarios. In our fiducial model, the predicted temperatures agree well with observational constraints at |$z$| ≲ 4, while being slightly high compared to (somewhat uncertain) data above that. Models with a larger contribution of AGN are instead disfavoured by the temperature data, as well as by measurements of the H i and He ii Lyman-α forest opacities. We also present ‘equivalent-equilibrium’ ionization/heating rates that mimic our fiducial UVB model for use in simulation codes that assume ionization equilibrium.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6807e89438e685c6c40da5130d5d6212a76deac1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. R. Dav'e
  2. S. Khochfar
  3. Claudio Dalla Vecchia
  4. K. Finlator
  5. Jan-Pieter Paardekooper
  6. P. Behroozi
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. T. Naab

In Instrumentation

  1. S. Khochfar
  2. Jan-Pieter Paardekooper
  3. K. Finlator
  4. Claudio Dalla Vecchia
  5. R. Livermore
  6. S. Finkelstein
  7. R. Ryan
  8. P. Behroozi

Citations in the corpus