Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets
By Isaac Caswell, Julia Kreutzer, Lisa Wang, Ahsan Wahab, Daan van Esch, Nasanbayar Ulzii-Orshikh, Allahsera Auguste Tapo, Nishant Subramani, Artem Sokolov, Claytone Sikasote and 42 more. 2021
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
With the success of large-scale pre-training and multilingual modeling in Natural Language Processing (NLP), recent years have seen a proliferation of large, Web-mined text datasets covering hundreds of languages. We manually audit the quality of 205 language-specific corpora released with five major public datasets (CCAligned, ParaCrawl, WikiMatrix, OSCAR, mC4). Lower-resource corpora have systematic issues: At least 15 corpora have no usable text, and a significant fraction contains less than 50% sentences of acceptable quality. In addition, many are mislabeled or use nonstandard/ambiguous language codes. We demonstrate that these issues are easy to detect even for non-proficient speakers, and supplement the human audit with automatic analyses. Finally, we recommend techniques to evaluate and improve multilingual corpora and discuss potential risks that come with low-quality data releases.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Graham Neubig
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mohit Bansal
- Quoc V. Le
- Noah A. Smith
- Jianfeng Gao
- Yejin Choi
- Percy Liang
In Natural Language Processing
- Graham Neubig
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mohit Bansal
- Orhan Firat
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Noah A. Smith
- Richard Socher
- Yejin Choi
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
- Sebastian Ruder
- Sebastian Gehrmann
- Stella Biderman
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Melvin Johnson
- Orhan Firat
- Anna Rogers
- Michael Lewis
Citations in the corpus
- The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Only (2023, background): “Furthermore, zero-shot generalization is the “natural” setting for autoregressive decoder-only models, in which they perform best (Wang et al., 2022).”
- Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes (2021, methodology): “With regards to CCAligned, a 119-language parallel dataset built off 68 snapshots of Common Crawl, Caswell et al. [40] revealed that there were notable amounts of pornographic content (> 10”
- The BigScience ROOTS Corpus: A 1.6TB Composite Multilingual Dataset (2023, methodology): “Crawled content also over-represents pornographic text across languages (Kreutzer et al., 2022), especially in the form of spam ads.”
- Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processing (2021, background): “Recent work has outlined the difficulty of finding data sources for lower-resourced languages through automatic filtering alone (Caswell et al., 2021).”
- PaLM 2 Technical Report (2023, background): “Memorization of the tail Though multilinguality presents many benefits to PaLM 2, it also presents a new risk for memorization: data is often scarcer and of poorer quality (Kreutzer et al., 2022).”
- Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022, background): “There has also been an increased focus on analyzing other dimensions of data quality and stewardship [102, 107, 121, 123], with several noteworthy initiatives aiming to document both existing [9, 20, 30, 43], and newly developed [16, 60, 136] resources.”
- What’s in the Box? An Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus (2021, background): “While certain notable endeavors have indeed analyzed specific aspects of corpora such as the Common Crawl (Kolias et al., 2014; Caswell et al., 2021) and Wikipedia (Hube, 2017), they have only scratched the surface of what these bodies of text contain.”
- Documenting Geographically and Contextually Diverse Data Sources: The BigScience Catalogue of Language Data and Resources (2022, background): “…Gehrmann et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021) and even to retrospectively document and analyze datasets that were developed and released by others without thorough documentation (Bandy and Vincent, 2021; Kreutzer et al., 2021; Birhane et al., 2021; Dodge et al., 2021).”
- In-context Examples Selection for Machine Translation (2022, background): “Table 8 shows that the source lexical overlap is a good indicator of the informativeness of a prompt for 3 out of 4 domains, with Koran as an exception.”
- Building Machine Translation Systems for the Next Thousand Languages (2022, methodology): “A recent audit conducted by Kreutzer et al. (2022) on five public, multilingual datasets found pervasive issues.”
- Biases in Large Language Models: Origins, Inventory, and Discussion (2023, background): “Although modern language models are trained on massive corpora [45, 78, 82, 107, 108], the documents that make up their training dataset are still a subset of the text available on the Web [27, 51, 132].”