Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets

By Isaac Caswell, Julia Kreutzer, Lisa Wang, Ahsan Wahab, Daan van Esch, Nasanbayar Ulzii-Orshikh, Allahsera Auguste Tapo, Nishant Subramani, Artem Sokolov, Claytone Sikasote and 42 more. 2021

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

With the success of large-scale pre-training and multilingual modeling in Natural Language Processing (NLP), recent years have seen a proliferation of large, Web-mined text datasets covering hundreds of languages. We manually audit the quality of 205 language-specific corpora released with five major public datasets (CCAligned, ParaCrawl, WikiMatrix, OSCAR, mC4). Lower-resource corpora have systematic issues: At least 15 corpora have no usable text, and a significant fraction contains less than 50% sentences of acceptable quality. In addition, many are mislabeled or use nonstandard/ambiguous language codes. We demonstrate that these issues are easy to detect even for non-proficient speakers, and supplement the human audit with automatic analyses. Finally, we recommend techniques to evaluate and improve multilingual corpora and discuss potential risks that come with low-quality data releases.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Quoc V. Le
  5. Noah A. Smith
  6. Jianfeng Gao
  7. Yejin Choi
  8. Percy Liang

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Graham Neubig
  2. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Orhan Firat
  5. Kyunghyun Cho
  6. Noah A. Smith
  7. Richard Socher
  8. Yejin Choi

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Sebastian Ruder
  2. Sebastian Gehrmann
  3. Stella Biderman
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Melvin Johnson
  6. Orhan Firat
  7. Anna Rogers
  8. Michael Lewis

Citations in the corpus