Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines

By Theo E. Notteboom *, P. D. de Langen, Wouter Jacobs. 2013

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67fa7291557d2d46d74c75c470a2cbfd98aa7ae3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
2. Theo E. Notteboom *
3. Zhongzhen Yang
4. F. Parola
5. P. Panayides
6. W. Yap

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
2. F. Parola
3. Zhongzhen Yang
4. P. Panayides
5. Theo E. Notteboom *
6. B. Slack
7. W. Yap
8. J.P. Rodrigue

In Management Information Systems

1. Zhongzhen Yang
2. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
3. F. Parola
4. Theo E. Notteboom *
5. P. Panayides
6. B. Slack
7. Daniel Olivier

Citations in the corpus

• Port governance in China since 2004 : institutional layering and the growing impact of broader policies (2017, background): “In a recent paper, Wang et al. (2015) provide a detailed analysis of the nature of port integration in China, including associated temporal pathways, spatial patterns and dynamics.”
• The effect of institutional factors on public–private partnership success in ports (2015, background): “With regard to the port sector in particular, various authors have used institutional theory as a base for understanding and developing a port governance system (e.g. Hall, 2003; Ng and Pallis, 2010; Ng et al., 2013; Notteboom et al., 2013).”