Objective Reduction in Many-Objective Optimization: Linear and Nonlinear Algorithms
By Dhish Kumar Saxena, João A. Duro, Ashutosh Tiwari, Kalyanmoy Deb, Qingfu Zhang. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2013
296 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67f9a3be09e5f5450685c60dfa9f9a6d09b6c7e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- A Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Reference Direction for Multiobjective and Many-Objective Optimization (2017, background): “objective reduction) focuses on the reduction of the number of objectives [6], [8], [37], [38], which attempts to circumvent the problems of MaOPs by means of identification and”
- Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (2015, methodology): “Paper Test Problems ( m ) L-PCA [Saxena et al. 2013] DTLZ(25), WFG(25) NL-MVU-PCA DTLZ5(I,M)(50) Exact-δ -MOSS/ k -EMOSS [Brockhoff and Zitzler 2009] - Greedy-δ -MOSS [Brockhoff and Zitzler 2006a, 2006b, 2009] DTLZ(25), MKP(25) Greedy-k -EMOSS [Brockhoff and Zitzler 2006a, 2006b, 2009] DTLZ(25),…”
- A Grid-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization (2013, unknown): “A detailed description of the DTLZ and DTLZ5(I,M ) problem suites can be found in [16], [60].”
- MOEA/D with Adaptive Weight Adjustment (2014, background): “NSGA-II deteriorates the situation by preferring the remote and boundary non-dominated solutions (Saxena et al., 2010); therefore, it obtains good coverage and diversity but converges slowly.”
- A Decision Variable Clustering-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Large-Scale Many-Objective Optimization (2018, background): “One branch is to use the objective reduction approaches to eliminate redundant or irrelevant objectives, such as dominance relation preservation based algorithms [40], [41], unsupervised feature selection based algorithms [42], Pareto corner search based algorithms [43], machine learning based objec”
- An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Dominance and Decomposition (2015, background): “analysis [56], to identify the embedded EF in the ambient objective space.”
- A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications (2023, background): “The potential benefits of objective reduction have been clearly highlighted in several studies (Saxena et al. 2013; Sinha et al. 2013; Yuan et al. 2018).”
- A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization (2017, methodology): “In addition, the DTLZ and WFG functions which are used as MaOPs with a degenerate Pareto front (i.e., DTLZ5, DTLZ6 and WFG3) have a nondegenerate part of the Pareto front when the number of objectives is larger than four [10,21,22].”
- Performance of Decomposition-Based Many-Objective Algorithms Strongly Depends on Pareto Front Shapes (2017, background): “they have four or more objectives [10], [36], [37].”
- Improved Regularity Model-Based EDA for Many-Objective Optimization (2018, background): “[45] proposed the linear PCA and nonlinear MVC over a set of Pareto-optimal solutions to check the correlation.”
- Two_Arch2: An Improved Two-Archive Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization (2015, methodology): “Additionally, Convergence g(x) is a part of the DTLZ problems, hence, we adopt it as a metric to analyze the convergence ability of Two_Arch2 as in [29].”