Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites

By J. Leitner, B. Hinterstoisser, M. Wastyn, J. Keckes, W. Gindl. 2007

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67ef67075ce357b94ed3c1a55801e157d39281a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. A. Dufresne
2. Kristiina Oksman
3. J. Bras
4. Mehdi Jonoobi
5. Gilberto de Freitas Siqueira
6. Orlando J. Rojas
7. Hiroyuki Yano
8. Y. Davoudpour

In Polymers and Plastics

1. A. Dufresne
2. Kristiina Oksman
3. J. Bras
4. M. Jawaid
5. Mehdi Jonoobi
6. Gilberto de Freitas Siqueira
7. M. Sain
8. R. Dungani

Citations in the corpus

• Cellulosic Bionanocomposites: A Review of Preparation, Properties and Applications (2010, background): “MFC isolated from kraft pulp [52,83], sulfite pulp [77], potato pulp [134], and sugar beet [135], were also studied as nanoreinforcement in different matrices such as PVA [52,77], HPC [77], potato starch plasticized with glycerol [134], and polyurethane (PU) [136,137].”
• Nanoedible films for food packaging: a review (2019, methodology): “[205] produced nanocellulose films from sugar beet pulp using solution casting method, and the films exhibited TS of 104 MPa and YM of 9 GPa, respectively.”
• Processing nanocellulose to bulk materials: a review (2019, background): “Evaporation of the solvent takes a long time, especially when the solvent is water (Aulin et al. 2010; Dufresne et al. 1997; Leitner et al. 2007; Malainine et al. 2005; Sehaqui et al. 2010; Siró and Plackett 2010).”