Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.
By Jim C Hu, X. Gu, Stuart R. Lipsitz, M. Barry, A. D'Amico, A. Weinberg, N. Keating. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2009
851 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67e2a6a848c44e472add36d0f605664308a2ddf0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (2012, neutral): “reported a significantly higher prevalence of erectile dysfunction after minimally invasive RP (MIRP) in comparison with RRP; however, no differences were reported in the number of procedures performed to treat this complication [57].”
- Guidelines on Prostate Cancer (2013, methodology): “An increased number of biopsies involved with tumour independently predicts extracapsular extension, margin involvement and lymph node invasion (22).”
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (2012, background): “However, no differences were reported in the number of procedures performed to treat that complication [63].”