A TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAX OF Sgr B2
By M. J. Reid, K. Menten, Xing-wu Zheng, A. Brunthaler, Ye Xu. 2009
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We have measured the positions of H2O masers in Sgr B2, a massive star-forming region in the Galactic center, relative to an extragalactic radio source with the Very Long Baseline Array. The positions measured at 12 epochs over a time span of one year yield the trigonometric parallax of Sgr B2 and hence a distance to the Galactic center of R0 = 7.9+0.8−0.7 kpc. The proper motion of Sgr B2 relative to Sgr A* suggests that Sgr B2 is ≈0.13 kpc nearer than the Galactic center, assuming a low-eccentricity Galactic orbit.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67d83584ef6a2f4906407b732c04f23a0b70c85c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- P. McMillan
- O. Gerhard
- R. Genzel
- Joss Bland-Hawthorn
- Mark R. Krumholz
- P. Hopkins
- K. Menten
- M. J. Reid
Citations in the corpus
- THE WISE CATALOG OF GALACTIC H ii REGIONS (2013, methodology): “…et al. 2007; (19) Moellenbrock et al. 2009; (20) Moscadelli et al. 2009; (21) Niinuma et al. 2011; (22) Oh et al. 2010; (23) Reid et al. 2009a; (24) Reid et al. 2009c; (25) Rygl et al. 2010; (26) Rygl et al. 2012; (27) Sanna et al. 2009; (28) Sanna et al. 2012; (29) Sato et al. 2008; (30) Sato…”
- Fundamental Parameters of the Milky Way Galaxy Based on VLBI Astrometry (2012, methodology): “If Vˇ = 5.25 km s 1 is adopted to this relation, the star-forming regions lag behind the Galactic rotation by 14 km s 1, confirming the earlier suggestion by Reid et al. (2009b).”
- Molecular gas kinematics within the central 250 pc of the Milky Way (2016, background): “So far, the only published maser proper motion values in the Galactic centre have been determined for the water masers in Sgr B2 (µl,µb = 2.3±1.0,−1.4±1.0 mas yr−1; Reid et al. 2009).”
- Spectral imaging of the Central Molecular Zone in multiple 3-mm molecular lines (2011, methodology): “We use the distance to the Galactic Centre of 8.0 kpc (Reid et al. 2009), so 1 arcmin corresponds to 2.3 pc.”
- The Australia Telescope Compact Array Broadband Backend (CABB): Description & First Results ⋆ (2011, methodology): “McGrath et al. (2004) show a similar spectrum at 0.66 kms−1 velocity resolution, while Reid et al. (2009) determined the trigonometric parallax of SgrB2 by measuring the H2O maser positions with the Very Large Baseline Array (VLBA) over one year.”
- The observed spiral structure of the Milky Way (2014, methodology): “A flat rotation curve (Reid et al. 2009b, 2014; Brunthaler et al. 2011) and the rotation curve of Brand & Blitz (1993, hereafter BB93) are adopted in calculating the kinematic distances.”
- What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy (2013, methodology): “5 kpc, which is consistent with Reid et al. 2009).”
- Trigonometric Parallaxes of High-mass Star-forming Regions: Our View of the Milky Way (2019, background): “A trigonometric parallax measurement of water masers from Sgr B2, a massive star-forming region within »100 pc of the Galactic center, indicates = R 7.9 0.8 kpc0 (Reid et al. 2009c).”
- Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole (2020, methodology): “This supports the interpretation that the compact radio source is coincident with the mass (Reid & Brunthaler 2004; Reid et al. 2009; Reid & Brunthaler 2020).”
- The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties (2016, methodology): “VLBI astrometry has provided accurate parallaxes and PMs for over 100 OH, SiO, and methanol masers in high-mass star-formation regions (HMSFRs) in the Galactic disk (Honma et al. 2007, 2012; Reid et al. 2009a, 2014; Sato et al. 2010).”
- DISCOVERY OF A SUPERLUMINAL Fe K ECHO AT THE GALACTIC CENTER: THE GLORIOUS PAST OF Sgr A* PRESERVED BY MOLECULAR CLOUDS (2010, background): “Its projected distance is about 100 pc East of Sgr A* and a recent parallax measurement places it about 130 pc in front of the plane of Sgr A* (Reid et al. 2009).”
- Complex organic molecules in the interstellar medium: IRAM 30 m line survey of Sagittarius B2(N) and (M) (2013, background): “It is the most massive star-forming region in our Galaxy, at a projected distance of∼ 100 pc from the Galactic center, which is located at 7.9±0.8 kpc from the Sun (Reid et al. 2009).”
- The dynamical evolution of molecular clouds near the Galactic Centre - I. Orbital structure and evolutionary timeline (2014, background): “Given that the proper motion of Sgr B2 could be measured using a∼ 1 yr baseline (Reid et al. 2009), the proper motion of the far-side clouds should be detectable with ease, provided that suitable masers can be identified.”
- AN IMPROVED DISTANCE AND MASS ESTIMATE FOR SGR A* FROM A MULTISTAR ORBIT ANALYSIS (2016, background): “VLBI measurements of the trigonometric parallax of H2O masers in the star forming region Sgr B2 give a value of 7.9±0.8 kpc (Reid et al. 2009), while dynamical modelling of the nuclear star cluster gives a statistical parallax distance to the Galactic Center of 8.27±0.13 kpc (Chatzopoulos et al.…”
- TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES OF HIGH MASS STAR FORMING REGIONS: THE STRUCTURE AND KINEMATICS OF THE MILKY WAY (2014, methodology): “The Bovy et al. (2009) re-analysis of our preliminary data employed a different ap- proach than that of Reid et al. (2009b).”
- The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way (2016, methodology): “They have therefore been used by numerous authors to constrain the properties of the Milky Way (e.g.,Reid et al. 2009a; McMillan & Binney 2010; Bovy et al. 2009; Bobylev & Bajkova 2013; Reid et al. 2014, Paper I).”
- The Bar and Spiral Structure Legacy (BeSSeL) Survey: Mapping the Milky Way with VLBI Astrometry† (2011, methodology): “A description that takes into account these two effects and gives (in general) more accurate kinematic distances, and a more realistic distance uncertainty estimate is also presented in Reid et al. (2009b).”