Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Self-compassion Scale

By Chen Jian, Liangshi Yan, Changsha. 2011

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67d022b7ea948abe1d1c6facef7e39aa57d8365f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Muris
2. K. Neff
3. Nicola Petrocchi
4. Henry Otgaar
5. F. Sirois
6. Lisa M. Yarnell
7. C. Germer
8. F. Raes

Citations in the corpus

• The Self-Compassion Scale is a Valid and Theoretically Coherent Measure of Self-Compassion (2016, background): “For example, a higher order factor was found with a Chinese student and Portuguese clinical and community samples (Castilho et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2011) but not with German and Italian student and community samples (Hupfield and Ruffieux 2011; Petrocchi et al.”
• Protection as the Mirror Image of Psychopathology: Further Critical Notes on the Self-Compassion Scale (2016, methodology): “Unsurprisingly, the overall factor analysis performed on all 26 items of the SCS convincingly showed that a six-correlatedfactor model yielded the best fit for the data, and it should be noted that most subsequent studies have shown that this structure of six related components provides the most opt”