Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity

By Christopher J. Honey, Olaf Sporns, Leila Cammoun, Xavier Gigandet, Jean-Philippe Thiran, J. Thiran, Reto Meuli, Patric Hagmann. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009

3,335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67ab606526f914d474b88ffb9c95a28de38aab52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Citations in the corpus

Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: a guide to neuroimaging literature (2017, background): “There is an abundance of research demonstrating a correlation between DWI-tractography connection weights and FC in adults (Hagmann et al., 2008; Hagmann et al., 2010; Honey et al., 2009).”
The Oscillating Brain: Complex and Reliable (2009, background): “…conclusion that these regions represent the functional core underlying resting brain dynamics, a notion recently supported by a computational model of the resting brain and network analyses combining functional and structural measures (Ghosh et al., 2008; Hagmann et al., 2008; Honey et al., 2009).”
Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques (2013, background): “RSNs are shaped by structural connectivity [Greicius et al., 2009; Honey et al., 2009; Kelly et al., 2010; Margulies et al., 2009; Vincent et al., 2007], closely resemble task-based activation networks [Biswal et al.”
Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors (2012, methodology): “Then the simulated BOLD signal was downsampled at 2 s to have the same resolution as in (Honey et al., 2009) and the global signal (average over all regions) (Fox et al., 2005, 2007) was regressed out of the BOLD time series.”
Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. (2011, background): “For example, it has been discovered that fMRI and DTI brain graphs consistently demonstrate some common global topological properties (Honey et al. 2009, Park et al. 2008, Skudlarski et al. 2008, Zalesky & Fornito 2009; see Figure 1), including: small-worldness—indicating a balance between network…”
Networks of anatomical covariance (2013, background): “…or fMRI (Achard and Bullmore, 2007, 2006; Bassett and Bullmore, 2006; Bellec et al., 2010; Biswal et al., 2010; Eguiluz et al., 2005; Greicius et al., 2003, 2004; He et al., 2009a; Honey et al., 2007, 2009; Salvador et al., 2005a, 2005b; Smith et al., 2009; Vértes et al., 2012; Zuo et al., 2010).”
Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? (2012, positive): “From a theoretical perspective, the main appeal of fcMRI is that it allows a direct and fairly straightforwardmeasure of interaction between areas of the brain, and that the signal, not depending only on direct mono-synaptic connections (Honey et al., 2009; Vincent et al., 2007), provides a fairly l”
TRIPLE REPRESENTATION OF LANGUAGE, WORKING MEMORY, SOCIAL AND EMOTION PROCESSING IN THE CEREBELLUM: CONVERGENT EVIDENCE FROM TASK AND SEED-BASED RESTING-STATE FMRI ANALYSES IN A SINGLE LARGE COHORT (2018, background): “, 2017), and some resting-state functional networks represent structural connectivity (Greicius et al., 2009; Honey et al., 2009).”
The Human Thalamus Is an Integrative Hub for Functional Brain Networks (2016, background): “measures correlations of spontaneous fluctuations in blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals, which are not a direct proxy for anatomical connectivity but are largely constrained by anatomical connections (9, 10).”
The Metastable Brain (2014, neutral): “Due to emergent properties of complex systems, such a description must go beyond the analysis of specialized brain regions and neural ensembles, per se (Kelso, 1995; Schierwagen, 2009; see also Bullock et al., 2005; Honey et al., 2009).”
Network-Level Structure-Function Relationships in Human Neocortex (2016, background): “…cortex and medial and lateral parietal cortices, yet have repeatedly failed to find evidence of anatomical projections betweenmedial parietal cortex (precuneus and posterior cingulate) and lateral parietal cortices cortices (Greicius et al. 2009; Honey et al. 2009; van den Heuvel et al. 2009).”
Hierarchical Heterogeneity across Human Cortex Shapes Large-Scale Neural Dynamics (2018, positive): “The association between dMRI-derived SC and rs-FC in human cortex has been consistently shown in prior studies (Greicius et al., 2009; Hagmann et al., 2008; Honey et al., 2009; Hermundstad et al., 2013; Baria et al., 2013), and provides the foundation for large-scale structure-function relationships”