Masses of Star Clusters in the Nuclei of Bulgeless Spiral Galaxies

By C. Walcher, R. P. van der Marel, D. McLaughlin, Hans-Walter Rix, T. Böker, N. Haering, Luis C. Ho, M. Sarzi, J. Shields. 2004

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In the last decade star clusters have been found in the centers of spiral galaxies across all Hubble types. We here present a spectroscopic study of the exceptionally bright (106-108 L☉) but compact (re ~ 5 pc) nuclear star clusters in very late type spirals with the Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph at the VLT. We find that the velocity dispersions of the nine clusters in our sample range from 13 to 34 km s-1. Using photometric data from the Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 and spherically symmetric dynamical models, we determine masses between 8 × 105 and 6 × 107 M☉. The mass-to-light ratios range from 0.2 to 1.5 in the I band. This indicates a young mean age for most clusters, in agreement with previous studies. Given their high masses and small sizes, we find that nuclear clusters are among the objects with the highest mean surface density known (up to 105 M☉ pc-2). From their dynamical properties we infer that, rather than small bulges, the closest structural kin of nuclear clusters appear to be massive compact star clusters. This includes such different objects as globular clusters, "super star clusters," ultracompact dwarf galaxies (UCDs), and the nuclei of dwarf elliptical galaxies. It is a challenge to explain why, despite the widely different current environments, all different types of massive star clusters share very similar and structural properties. A possible explanation links UCDs and massive globular clusters to nuclear star clusters through stripping of nucleated dwarf galaxies in a merger event. The extreme properties of this type of cluster would then be a consequence of the clusters' location in the centers of their respective host galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67947c1f7c96a7d5ac9bc9179df2e1e09aba0e50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Thomas J. Cox
  4. Luis C. Ho
  5. Volker Springel
  6. E. Quataert
  7. Alister W. Graham
  8. J. Kormendy

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Thomas J. Cox
  4. Luis C. Ho
  5. Alister W. Graham
  6. E. Quataert
  7. Volker Springel
  8. J. Kormendy

Citations in the corpus