The Role of Typicality in Object Classification: Improving The Generalization Capacity of Convolutional Neural Networks
By Babak Saleh, Ahmed M. Elgammal, J. Feldman. 2016
16 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Deep artificial neural networks have made remarkable progress in different tasks in the field of computer vision. However, the empirical analysis of these models and investigation of their failure cases has received attention recently. In this work, we show that deep learning models cannot generalize to atypical images that are substantially different from training images. This is in contrast to the superior generalization ability of the visual system in the human brain. We focus on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) as the state-of-the-art models in object recognition and classification; investigate this problem in more detail, and hypothesize that training CNN models suffer from unstructured loss minimization. We propose computational models to improve the generalization capacity of CNNs by considering how typical a training image looks like. By conducting an extensive set of experiments we show that involving a typicality measure can improve the classification results on a new set of images by a large margin. More importantly, this significant improvement is achieved without fine-tuning the CNN model on the target image set.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Thomas Serre
- Tarun Sharma
- P. Gupta
- Sven Eberhardt
- Drew Linsley
- Dan Scheibler
- Luc Van Gool
- Andrew Zisserman
Citations in the corpus
- Global-and-local attention networks for visual recognition (2018, background): “While recent advancements in DCNs have led to models that perform on par with human observers in basic visual recognition tasks, there is also growing evidence of qualitative differences in the visual strategies that they employ [47, 48, 39, 35].”
- What are the Visual Features Underlying Human Versus Machine Vision? (2017, background): “It has also been shown that DCNs do not generalize well to atypical scenes, such as when objects are presented outside of their usual context [23].”