Envy and Its Consequences: Why It Is Useful to Distinguish between Benign and Malicious Envy

By N. van de Ven. 2016

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6773467eb977dfe736c607626a0be4ced77ff1a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. N. van de Ven
2. J. Crusius
3. Jens Lange
4. Manuel F. Gonzalez
5. Yochi Cohen-Charash
6. Sonja Utz
7. Ruoyun Lin

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. N. van de Ven
2. J. Crusius
3. Jens Lange
4. Manuel F. Gonzalez
5. Yochi Cohen-Charash
6. Alan Thomas
7. Bart Engelen
8. Alfred Archer

In Social Psychology

1. J. Crusius
2. Jens Lange
3. N. van de Ven
4. Manuel F. Gonzalez
5. Yochi Cohen-Charash
6. Alan Thomas
7. Bart Engelen
8. Alfred Archer

Citations in the corpus

• Envy: An Adversarial Review and Comparison of Two Competing Views (2019, background): “Thus, by expanding envy’s conceptualization, the distinction between benign and malicious envy contributes to a more complete understanding of envy, its determinants, and its consequences (also see Van de Ven, 2016).”
• Exemplars and nudges: Combining two strategies for moral education (2018, background): “For a justification of the distinction between benign and malicious forms of envy, see [van de Ven (2016)].”