Using Machine Learning to Break Visual Human Interaction Proofs (HIPs)
By Kumar Chellapilla, Patrice Y. Simard. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/675b93244f917d5dc2c79b89d2936d81d077e663
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Elie Bursztein
- Dileep George
- Jonathan Aigrain
- John C. Mitchell
- Wolfgang Lehrach
- Miguel L'azaro-Gredilla
- A. Moscicki
- Matthieu Martin
Citations in the corpus
- A generative vision model that trains with high data efficiency and breaks text-based CAPTCHAs (2017, background): “Segmentation resistance, the primary defense of text-based CAPTCHAs, has been a general principle that enabled their automated generation (2, 3).”
- The End is Nigh: Generic Solving of Text-based CAPTCHAs (2014, background): “The standard approach to solving captchas automatically has been a sequential process wherein a segmentation algorithm splits the image into segments that contain individual characters, followed by a character recognition step that uses machine learning [13].”
- Text-based CAPTCHA strengths and weaknesses (2011, methodology): “Prior to this work, state of the art automated solvers used a three-stage approach consisting of preprocessing, segmentation and classification stages [9].”
- A low-cost attack on a Microsoft captcha (2008, background): “Chellapilla and Simard [ 3 ] attacked a number of visual CAPTCHAs taken from the web”