Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution

595 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Flight response of slope‐soaring birds to seasonal variation in thermal generation (2015, unknown): “We accounted for multiple comparisons within models using false discovery rates (Benjamini & Hochberg 1995; Garc ıa 2004; Pike 2011).”
Are there differences between behavioral measurement methods? A comparison of the predictive validity of two ratings methods in a working dog program (2012, unknown): “Due to the large number of comparisons (Pike, 2011) and large sample size (Yoccoz, 1991) for this analysis, we emphasized interpretation of correlation coefficients as weak/not different from zero (0.”
Old‐growth forests buffer climate‐sensitive bird populations from warming (2018, methodology): “Therefore, we used a false discovery rate (FDR) procedure (the “graphically sharpened method” [Pike, 2011]) which does not suffer from the same loss of power but corrects for multiple comparisons across species.”