Mixotrophy in planktonic protists: an overview

By Roger I. Jones. 2000

388 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/673ebcd3dc9a0d3d104f1f39943735acc2b2e5a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Saiz
2. A. Calbet
3. Kevin J. Flynn
4. J. Burkholder
5. K. Jürgens
6. Aditee Mitra
7. P. Glibert
8. Ramon Massana

In Molecular Biology

1. P. Glibert
2. Ramon Massana
3. K. Jürgens
4. P. J. Hansen
5. Antonio Camacho
6. Fabrice Not
7. J. Burkholder
8. U. John

In Oceanography

1. P. Glibert
2. E. Saiz
3. J. Burkholder
4. Aditee Mitra
5. A. Calbet
6. Nico Salmaso
7. J. Padisák
8. Hayley M. Skelton

Citations in the corpus

• Species-specific differences in phytoplankton responses to N and P enrichments and the N:P ratio in the Archipelago Sea, northern Baltic Sea (2004, background): “High abundances of mixotrophs are usually recorded in humic lakes with low nutrient concentrations and low light conditions ( Jones, 2000), but the role of mixotrophs in brackish and marine environments is poorly known.”
• Morpho-Functional Groups and phytoplankton development in two deep lakes (Lake Garda, Italy and Lake Stechlin, Germany) (2007, background): “…from the other (large and small) flagellates; this division corresponds roughly to the separation of the potential mixotrophs from mostly autotrophic algae (Isaksson, 1998; Jones, 2000), though, at present, no complete information exists about the importance of mixotrophy for the single species.”
• Mixotrophic protists and a new paradigm for marine ecology: where does plankton research go now? (2019, background): “Because the combining of primary and secondary production in a single organism radically changes biogeochemical and trophic dynamics involving those organisms (Hitchman and Jones, 2000; Mitra et al., 2014b; Caron, 2016; Ward and Follows, 2016; Ghyoot et al., 2017a, 2017b; Leles et al. 2018).”
• Mixotrophy : a widespread and important ecological strategy for planktonic and sea-ice nanoflagellates in the Ross Sea, Antarctica (2009, background): “The potential nutritional benefits of particle ingestion by phytoplankton include the acquisition of organic carbon, energy, major nutrients, and micronutrients including vitamins and trace metals (Sanders et al. 1990, Caron et al. 1993, Maranger et al. 1998, Hansen et al. 2000, Jones 2000).”
• Landscape regulation of bacterial growth efficiency in boreal freshwaters (2007, background): “BGE determines the degree to which bioavailable substrates can sustain BP and its potential use in heterotrophic food chains [Jones, 2000].”
• Mixotrophy, a major mode of nutrition for harmful algal species in eutrophic waters (2008, background): “Quantification of the importance of mixotrophy to harmful algae in estuarine and coastal marine environments has been impeded because of the diverse array of dissolved organic substrates, many of which are uncharacterized or poorly characterized (Jones, 2000; Benner, 2002; Bronk, 2002; Karl and Björ”
• Protistan Grazing on Marine Bacterioplankton (2008, background): “…only when prey concentrations are limiting (Caron et al. 1990), whereas others are primarily phototrophs, using phagotrophy to gain carbon under light-limited conditions (Jones 2000), or when inorganic nutrients (Nygaard and Tobiesen 1993) or trace elements (Maranger et al. 1998) become limiting.”
• On the occurrence and ecological features of deep chlorophyll maxima (DCM) in Spanish stratified lakes (2006, background): “Mixotrophy then (either phagotrophy or osmotrophy), when occurring, seems to represent a complementary mechanism allowing harvesting of certain substances or the maintenance during unfavourable periods (Bird & Kalff, 1989; Tranvik et al., 1989; Jones, 2000; Laybourn-Parry et al., 2005).”