ON THE CAUSALITY BETWEEN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND OUTPUT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

By Johan Ericsson, Manuchehr Irandoust. 2001

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/673e57425b5eee5b9957c23ca86cf8baed0b0f1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. Law
2. W. Azman-Saini
3. L. Serven
4. Norman V. Loayza
5. A. Alam
6. A. Z. Baharumshah
7. César Calderón
8. S. F. Shah

In Information Systems

1. S. Law
2. W. Azman-Saini
3. A. Alam
4. Norman V. Loayza
5. S. F. Shah
6. L. Serven
7. P. Sahoo
8. Chew Ging Lee

In Strategy and Management

1. W. Azman-Saini
2. A. Alam
3. S. Law
4. S. F. Shah
5. L. Serven
6. P. Sahoo
7. Chew Ging Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia: Policy, Trends, Impact and Determinants (2006, background): “Similarly Ericsson and Irandoust (2001) fail to find any relationship between FDI and growth for Denmark and Finland but find causality from FDI to GDP growth for Norway.”
• Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and economic growth: International evidence (2010, background): “…have found that FDI exerts a positive growth effect on the recipient countries (De Mello, 1999; Chong et al., 2010), while others have found no such evidence (Ericsson and Irandoust, 2001) or even a negative effect (Moran, 1998) on growth [see also the survey by Gorg and Greenaway (2004)].”
• Foreign Direct Investment - Growth Nexus: A Review of the Recent Literature (2008, unknown): “…Direct Investment-Growth Nexus: A Review of Literature c. Nair-Reichert and Weinhold (2001) 24 developing countries 1971- 95 Significant and positive Ericsson and Irandoust (2001) Sweeden, Norway, Denmark, Finland Causal relationship only for Sweeden Hanson (2001) Positive but weak Lensink and…”
• Greenfield Foreign Direct Investment and Mergers and Acquisitions: Feedback and Macroeconomic Effects (2004, background): “Studies of this type include Choe (2003), Basu, Chakraborty, and Reagle (2003), de Mello (1999), Ericsson and Irandoust (2001), Agosin and Mayer (2000), and Razin (2002). reflect the purchase (or liquidation) of assets, at the macroeconomic level there is no simple way to ascertain the extent to…”
• Determinants of foreign direct investment in OECD member countries (2013, background): “On the contrary, some studies have found no significant relationship between FDI and economic growth (Ericsson and Irandoust, 2001).”
• Foreign direct investment, pollution and economic growth: evidence from Malaysia (2009, methodology): “Ericsson and Irandoust (2001) use the test developed by Toda and Yamamoto (1995) and Yamada and Toda (1998) to investigate the Granger causality between the annual growth rate of real GDP per capita and the rate of change of FDI inflows for Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.”