Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom

By Ian J. Bateman, Amii R. Harwood, Georgina M. Mace, R. Watson, D. Abson, Barnaby Andrews, A. Binner, A. Crowe, Brett Day, S. Dugdale and 15 more. Science, 2013

1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/672e3458b07a7cd7d5365aa788c297c90c8d40ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

What make consumer sign up to PHEVs? Predicting Malaysian consumer behavior in adoption of PHEVs (2018, background): “For example, Beck and Ajzen (1991) and Ajzen, 1991; Chen et al., 2010; and Chen and Tung, 2014 specified that the TBP’s explanatory power has been increased by personal approaches of moral accountability or individual moral ethics when inspecting the intention of individuals to behave in an…”
The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications (2017, methodology): “We synthesized three existing sets of scenarios (Raskin et al., 2002; Bateman et al., 2013; Costanza et al., 2015) to develop and evaluate the future value of global ecosystem services under four alternative land-use and management scenarios (Table 1).”
Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies (2015, background): “…are rare, although the opportunity costs of alternative land uses (Goldstein et al., 2012; Swallow et al., 2009) and monetary valuation of nonmarket ES (Bateman et al., 2013; Bryan et al., 2010; Bryan and Crossman, 2013; Naidoo and Ricketts, 2006; Nelson et al., 2009) are often accounted for.”
Facilitation and sustainable agriculture: a mechanistic approach to reconciling crop production and conservation (2016, background): “Assessments of ecosystem service delivery indicate that land management decisions focussed solely on agricultural output reduce overall ecosystem service values, whilst planning for multiple services can have benefits for conserving wild species diversity (Bateman et al. 2013).”
The ecological economics of land degradation: impacts on ecosystem service values. (2016, methodology): “As more and better information becomes available, or if one wanted to do a more detailed regional scale study, more sophisticated bene ﬁ t transfer methods or other modeling methods can be used (Bateman et al., 2013; Schmidt et al., 2016; Turner et al., 2016).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “A positive outcome of this, according to Bateman et al. (2013), “if farmers [were] rewarded for the delivery of a broad spectrum of ecosystem services,” would be to “provide policy-makers with a very powerful tool through which to secure beneficial land-use change.””
Shades of green: a social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector (2014, background): “In the greener shades of the wide bioeconomy fan of agendas, we find policy goals like management of natural ecosystems for sustained ecosystem services and protection of biodiversity (Kumar 2010; Bateman et al. 2013).”
Changes in the global value of ecosystem services (2014, positive): “These approaches are beginning to be implemented (Bateman et al., 2013; Boumans et al., 2002; Burkhard et al., 2013; Costanza et al., 2008; Costanza and Voinov, 2003; Crossman et al., 2012; Goldstein et al., 2012; Nelson et al., 2009) and this represents the cutting edge of research in this field.”
Optimizing land use decision-making to sustain Brazilian agricultural profits, biodiversity and ecosystem services (2016, background): “In contrast to the more commonly applied scenario-based assessments (e.g., Bateman et al., 2013; Koh and Ghazoul, 2010; Law et al., 2015; Nelson et al., 2009; Qiu and Turner, 2013), the efficiency frontiers allow us to (1) assess whether current land use planning and policies like the Forest Code…”