Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds
By Timothy Q. Gentner, Kimberly M. Fenn, D. Margoliash, Howard C. Nusbaum. Nature, 2006
579 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Developmental Biology, Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/672c433f582363a79e413773ff2f1fc214da42d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
In Developmental Biology
In Ecology
Citations in the corpus
- Language as shaped by the brain. (2008, background): “However, as we note further on in section 6.5, any given linguistic phenomenon is likely to arise from a combination of multiple constraints that cut across these groupings, and, thus, across different kinds of brain mechanisms.”
- Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory (2009, background): “Surprisingly, tests on monkeys (2) and on songbirds (3) showed that whereas songbirds can process AnBn sequences, monkeys cannot.”
- Accuracy of song syntax learning and singing consistency signal early condition in zebra finches (2008, background): “If there are some general nonlearned rules constraining element sequencing (Soha and Marler 2001; Rose et al. 2004; Gentner et al. 2006) knowledge of a specific male’s model song does not have to be a prerequisite to judging its quality.”